A Texas man who gained notoriety for claiming he could live in a $340,000 suburban Dallas house for $16 has gained much publicity due to his thinking outside the box.
Robinson, 51, lived on port Drive in Flower Mound, Texas, however he failed to own or rent the house he claimed he had a right to move in when the owner abandoned the property, that had been in legal proceeding for over a year, and therefore the mortgage company reportedly went out of business, he submitted a $16 filing fee at the native courthouse, claiming the law of “adverse possession” gave him the right to occupy the house.
The black African-American saw a law that he could use to get what he wanted and he swung into action thereby landing himself a $340,000 house for just $16. Kenneth Robinson had filed an “affidavit of adverse possession” giving him the right to live in the empty home in Flower Mound in August 2011.
The law of adverse possession is rarely used as only a handful of people are privy to its details and just few people have successfully used it to get a house almost for nothing.
The move made Kenneth trend on the news and also became a kind of local celebrity, speaking to law school students and capitalizing on his fame by creating a website http://16dollarhouse.com to talk to people about his experience, it is recorded that the site and Kenneth got the attention of quite a lot of people who were looking to own a home without paying for it.
Kenneth Robinson basked in the attention he enjoyed whilst attending interviews and also talking to newsmen in the home.
The American state law, conjointly referred to as squatter’s rights, provides an individual the right to move in if the owner of a property can’t be found, and therefore the property is being without an owner can be claimed by anyone. Police couldn’t find anyone or business related to the house that might file a grievance against Robinson. One of the neighbors was quoted saying “What may be legally permissible is not necessarily ethically right.
However, a judge in Denton County ruled that the present lienholder, Bank of America, will force Robinson out. After the judge’s call, he told the Associated Press that he had moved out of the premises, ending what he sees as a “huge learning experience.” Prosecutors in the area cracking down on others hoping to pull a Kenneth Robinson on them again.
Ferrara, a partner in Newman Ferrara, a replacement royalty town assets business firm, adverse possession was enacted to make sure that a property wasn’t abandoned and was “maintained and monitored at all times.”
To keep your house from being occupied according to the law, you need to post a clear, public notice that somebody is at the property — thus the court filing — which someone would stay there for a particular amount will not arise.
However, if no sign is put up and the house is truly abandoned, a person or family can move in after filing a claim the rule sates that the new occupants must occupy the house for a period of 10 years to be able to lay claim to the house as theirs.
In the meantime, the first landowner may fight the action, however it’d be pricey and since the house has already been abandoned, it is not seemingly possible that the first owner would wage an upscale legal battle to urge it back. It hereby falls to the creditor who would drag the occupant to court over unlawful possession.
The growing variety of abandoned homes brought on by the legal proceeding crisis has created alittle buzz round the plan of adverse possession. An interpreter for the National Association of Realtors, however, said adverse possession wasn’t common nor on the association’s radar screen.
A Google search, will show how many websites are willing to teachanyone a way to do what Ken Robinson did. At AdversePossession.com, for an example, for a mere $39.95, “average people” will learn the way to “acquire valuable assets at no cost.” the website takes steps to assure potential Robinsons
“Squatter,” says the website, “is associated with an unfortunate and negative term accustomed describe somebody who unlawfully occupies a vacant property or different asset.”
Neighbors are not really cool with the fast one Ken played on them all, a neighbor was quoted saying “he initial moved in, we told native reporters that “If he [Robinson] desires the house, he should buy the house like everybody else had to and do the right thing”
David DeCosse, the director of field ethics programs at the Markkulla Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University, said that although Robinson could have a right to what he is doing, it is not essentially the correct thing to do.
Thomas Aquinas, said “within the case of extreme emergency, it’d be okay to do something like take food from a food supermarket as a result of hunger as food is supposed to support and address human wants therefore stealing would be OK in sure circumstances.
Kenneth Robinson saw a loophole in the housing laws and took advantage of it and although he was later evicted on some technical grounds, the experience he got from it was both educating and adventurous.